The landlord rings the bell for last orders, and Pavlov immediately jumps out of his seat, "Shit, I forgot to feed the dogs!”
Okay, here’s my attempt at a “Joke Poo” version of the Pavlov joke, titled “Code Completion.”
Title: Code Completion
A software engineer, Barry, is hunched over his keyboard at home, deep in coding a complex new application. His partner, Sarah, is trying to watch a movie in the same room.
Every few minutes, Barry mutters commands aloud to his IDE (Integrated Development Environment) for code completion: “dot… equals… parentheses…” He’s so focused he doesn’t even notice he’s doing it.
After a particularly long, drawn-out coding session, Sarah, increasingly annoyed, gets up to make a cup of tea. As she plugs in the kettle, it clicks on with a loud thunk.
Barry instantly jumps up, scattering his papers. “Damn it!” he shouts, “I forgot to commit my changes!”
Alright, let’s break down this Pavlov joke and then see what comedic culinary delights we can cook up.
Joke Dissection:
- Core Concept: Exploits the famous Pavlovian conditioning. Pavlov conditioned dogs to salivate at the sound of a bell by associating it with food.
- Humor Source: The unexpected response. Instead of salivating (the conditioned response), Pavlov interprets the bell as a reminder of his responsibility to feed the dogs. It subverts expectations by applying a conditioned response inappropriately to a different, albeit related, domain (Pavlov’s work).
- Key Elements:
- Ivan Pavlov: Scientist, conditioning.
- Bell: Conditioned stimulus.
- Dogs: Recipients of conditioning, need feeding.
- Pub: Mundane, unexpected setting.
- Last Orders: Specific time-related trigger that creates urgency and heightens the absurdity of Pavlov’s reaction.
Comedic Enrichment:
Now, let’s use some Pavlov-related facts to craft some comedic extensions:
Option 1: A Witty Observation:
“It’s ironic that Pavlov, who dedicated his life to understanding predictable behavior, was probably the most unpredictable guy at pub trivia night. One wrong answer and he’d start drooling over the meatball subs.”
Justification: Uses the contrast between Pavlov’s scientific focus and the mundane setting to highlight the potential absurdity of his professional obsessions bleeding into everyday life.
Option 2: A New Joke:
“Why did Pavlov always carry a tiny bell with him? Because he was deathly afraid of accidentally conditioning himself to crave cabbage.”
Justification: Extends the concept of conditioning to Pavlov himself, adding a self-deprecating twist. It also plays on the (potentially less appetizing) idea of conditioning oneself to crave something specific. Cabbage, of course, being more funny than something desirable.
Option 3: An Amusing “Did You Know?”:
“Did you know that after Pavlov’s death, the Soviet government nationalized his dogs? Turns out, in a socialist state, even canine drool became a collective resource. I guess they were hoping to condition everyone to love five-year plans.”
Justification: Based on the (slightly exaggerated but rooted in historical context) idea of Soviet control. It takes the principle of conditioning and applies it to a societal level, adding a layer of political satire.
Option 4: A Continuation of the Original Joke:
(Following the original joke where Pavlov jumps up)
“His mate John says ‘Easy, Ivan. The dogs are probably asleep. Also, you’ve been drinking beer since noon, that bell might be your stomach telling you it’s time to eat, not the hounds.’ Ivan shakes his head ‘Nonsense, John, the salivation response is… oh, is that a Scotch egg?'”
Justification: This builds on the original punchline, adding a relatable element of pub-induced forgetfulness and immediate distraction by a salty snack. It also provides a more subtle (and potentially even more realistic) explanation of Pavlov’s urgent reaction.

