Wife: "OK, so now you just want me to forget everything and spread my legs?
Husband: "We don't own a vase?"
Okay, here’s my “Joke Poo” version of that joke:
Joke Poo: The Interview
An aspiring chef goes into a prestigious restaurant for a kitchen trial after a disastrous phone interview.
Head Chef: “Alright, so now you think you can just waltz in here and magically prepare a five-star meal?”
Chef Applicant: “We do have ingredients, right?”
Alright, let’s dissect this comedic specimen.
Joke Breakdown:
- Setup: Husband’s peace offering (flowers) after an argument. Creates an expectation of reconciliation.
- Wife’s Response: A cynical interpretation, assuming the flowers are a manipulative attempt to quickly move to intimacy. Explicit and provocative.
- Husband’s Response: An absurd, non-sequitur focusing on a practical concern (lack of a vase). This is the punchline because:
- It deflates the wife’s expectation of a conversation about the argument.
- It highlights the husband’s avoidance of emotional engagement.
- It’s unexpected and jars with the wife’s accusatory tone.
- Humor: The humor lies in the mismatch between the wife’s emotional intensity and the husband’s detached, almost oblivious, practicality. It’s a classic “battle of the sexes” trope with a twist.
Key Elements:
- Flowers: Symbol of romance, apology, or superficial gesture.
- Argument: Underlying tension and unresolved conflict.
- Vase: Mundane, practical object, contrasting with the romantic gesture and emotional baggage.
- Miscommunication: A lack of understanding between the husband and wife.
Comedic Enrichment:
Let’s focus on the vase and its incongruity.
New Joke/Observation:
Why did the husband buy a 3D printer after the flower incident?
He figured if he couldn’t find a vase, he’d just manufacture plausible deniability… and several containers for spare change.
Amusing “Did You Know?”:
Did you know that the oldest vases ever discovered, dating back over 6,000 years, were not used for displaying flowers at all? They were used to store… fermented beverages! So, perhaps the husband’s “no vase” comment wasn’t a dismissal, but a subtle hint that he needed something stronger than mere flowers to get over the argument. Maybe his next gift should be a keg stand…inside the manufactured plausibility device.
Explanation of Enrichment:
- The new joke builds upon the original. The 3D printer is an extension of the husband’s pragmatic response. “Plausible deniability” refers to an absence of clear, verifiable knowledge of the truth or falsehood of facts. He now manufactures solutions for future lack of emotional connection.
- The “Did You Know?” adds an ironic twist. Vases weren’t always about romance and beauty; they had a more functional, potentially alcoholic, purpose. This plays into the husband’s practical/avoidant character.
The aim is to amplify the original joke’s humor by layering in unexpected information and expanding on the absurdity of the situation.

