"….I don't know. "
gasp "It was YOU!"
Joke Poo: What’s the difference between a motivational speaker and a dog trainer?
“…I don’t know.”
Whispers intensely “One poops on the stage after getting paid to give people ‘direction’, and the other… you pick it up.”
Alright, let’s break down this gloriously crude joke and see what comedic gold we can mine from it.
Joke Dissection:
- Premise: The joke sets up a “what’s the difference” scenario, a classic setup for a riddle or comparison-based punchline. This creates an expectation of a clever, analytical answer.
- Anticipation/Suspense: The responder admitting “I don’t know” heightens the suspense. We’re waiting for the reveal.
- Punchline: The punchline (“It was YOU!”) is a complete subversion of expectation. It’s accusatory, nonsensical in the context of the original question, and relies entirely on the implication that one has used the shower curtain as a substitute for toilet paper. This relies heavily on the audience’s understanding of toilet paper’s intended function vs. the shower curtain’s.
- Humor: The humor comes from the unexpected accusatory leap, the gross-out implication, and the incongruity between the setup and the resolution. It’s shocking and absurd.
Key Elements for Exploitation:
- Toilet Paper: Absorbency, disposal, societal necessity, variety (ply, quilted, etc.), fear of running out.
- Shower Curtain: Material, water resistance, patterns/decor, cleanliness (or lack thereof), hook mechanism.
- Accusation: Surprise, guilt, the absurdity of accusing someone based on lack of knowledge.
Comedic Enrichment Attempts:
Here are a few avenues we can explore:
1. New Joke:
“What’s the difference between a 3-ply quilted toilet paper and a shower curtain?”
“I don’t know.”
“One’s designed to handle life’s little emergencies, the other… well, it’s just hanging there with all the evidence.”
* *Rationale:* Builds on the original, adding specificity to the toilet paper. The punchline is less direct but still implies guilt and uses wordplay to add a layer of sophistication.
2. Witty Observation:
“The scariest part of running out of toilet paper isn’t the lack of a suitable substitute. It’s the dawning realization of who in your house has been treating the shower curtain like a communal hand towel.”
* *Rationale:* This plays on the social awkwardness and mild disgust of the situation. It shifts the focus from the act itself to the potential social implications.
3. Amusing “Did You Know?”
“Did you know that during the Great Toilet Paper Shortage of 2020, some people actually tried using shower curtains as a substitute? While resourceful, many reported issues with ‘absorbency’ and ‘hook compatibility’ during the laundering process. Scientists are still studying the long-term effects on the shower curtain industry.”
* *Rationale:* This combines the joke's premise with a real-world event (the toilet paper shortage). It adds a layer of mock-scientific analysis and absurdity to the idea of using a shower curtain as a toilet paper alternative. It makes the audience chuckle at the (hopefully) fictional scientific studies of post TP-apocalypse shower curtains.
4. Alternative Punchline
“What’s the difference between toilet paper and a shower curtain?”
“I don’t know.”
“One goes on sale every other week. The other? You have to replace it completely.”
Rationale: This still subverts expectations, but instead of going the gross-out route, it brings a mundane observation about consumerism to the punchline. It’s cleaner, less shocking, and more of an “aha” moment.
These are just a few ways to enrich the humor in the original joke. The key is to identify the elements that make the joke funny and then use those elements to create new, related comedic content. The gross-out and the surprise are powerful comedic tools that, when wielded creatively, can yield some very funny results.

